I guess you never head of "Lucy" discovered and dated as lived about 3.3 million years ago. Older skeletons are probably around but are few and far between due to changes in the structure of the earth.
I guess you never head of "Lucy" discovered and dated as lived about 3.3 million years ago. Older skeletons are probably around but are few and far between due to changes in the structure of the earth.
Clint, Lucy was a kind of monkey, her brain was small and her life primitive. There are not been human civilization before 30 thousands years ago. So it's absurd talking about yuga lasting 432000 years each!!
It is possible (though contradictory to what fossil record suggests) that humans existed further back, just that all signs have been eliminated and that our unevolved predecessors hung around further than we thought, and that we lived in kind.
Perhaps they're what we call demons and elves and goblins in our myths? Haha.
Still, no evidence, maybe we took a stargate to Atlantis.
The second Lucy was part human, part monkey Frank. That's a big discovery!
The second Lucy was part human, part monkey Frank. That's a big discovery!
BS. Now they call half human every old monkey they find around, but look her brain, her way of life. She was a monkey: they had no culture, no civilaziotion, no language.
It was the bone structure that was part human.
It was the bone structure that was part human.
Yes I know, but it is not bone structure that makes us different from monkeys. Her bones could be just accidentally similar to our, in millions of years earth produced many strange kind of animals and monkeys.
Anyway, as I said before, there has not been technological civilizations on earth before 30 thousands years ago, so yuga cannot last 432 thousands years, it's absurd. Unless you think we came from other planets, but this would be strange since our genetics is 99% the same of earthly monkeys.
You can't draw a line anywhere dividing humans from monkeys, it's general classifications. Since we're missing the majority of fossils, it doesn't matter if we miss the exact point, since you're going every hundred generations or whatever.
You can't draw a line anywhere dividing humans from monkeys, it's general classifications. Since we're missing the majority of fossils, it doesn't matter if we miss the exact point, since you're going every hundred generations or whatever.
Why not? We have 300 genes that monkeys doesn't have, and probably they have been inserted artificially by aliens at once (see zacaria stichin site).
