What do you choose?

What do you choose?
Atheistic and materialist theory of evolution of humans from unknown ancient apes, or intelligent design and the existence of a spiritual world which shapes "physical" world and gods/angels who created humans?

I think it's misleading to describe evolution as "atheistic". One can be a theist and also accept the theory of evolution. Though it's true that evolution is not reliant on god(s), I guess it could be described as atheistic, but that would be like calling gravity or the third law of thermodynamics atheistic. I don't accept either of the options proposed. I think the world was created yesterday by reptilian aliens. They've made the world seem like it's much older, including implanting us with memories so we think we have lived many years. Look beyond the illusion!

who created reptilians?

who created reptilians? They want you to ask silly questions like that to distract you from the really important ones.

which are really important?

---------------------------------------

genetic engineering is BS. It will never work.

---------------------------------------

He is Falun Frank I suppose?

---------------------------------------

which are really important? Exactly, now you're on the right track!

Charles Darwin himself stated in his book On the Origin of Species, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been produced by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” Biochemist Michael Behe has pointed to irreducibly complex biological systems, such as bacterial flagella (which act as propellers) and cilia (biological sensory antennae). Neither of these could have been the products of gradual evolution because “the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning. An irreducibly complex system cannot be produced directly (that is, by continuously improving the initial function, which continues to work by the same mechanism) by slight, successive modifications of a precursor system, because any precursor to an irreducibly complex system that is missing a part is by definition nonfunctional.” (Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Behe 1996). Additionally, Darwinists have never been able to convincingly explain how complex cell machinery developed, nor have they experimentally demonstrated the origin of the first living cell from inanimate matter.

Charles Darwin himself stated in his book On the Origin of Species, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been produced by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” The fact that no one is currently able to come up with an explanation is not a complete proof that a particular organ "could not possibly have been produced by numerous, successive slight modifications". However someone usually can anyway (see below). Biochemist Michael Behe has pointed to irreducibly complex biological systems, such as bacterial flagella (which act as propellers) and cilia (biological sensory antennae). Just because the great Prof. Behe says it doesn't make it true: Evolution in (Brownian) space: a model for the origin of the bacterial flagellum & The Evolution of Eukaryotic Cilia and Flagella as Motile and Sensory Organelles. Additionally, Darwinists have never been able to convincingly explain how complex cell machinery developed Yeah, they have. Well maybe it wasn't done so "convincingly" to everyone. Some people are still yet to be "convinced" the Earth is round. nor have they experimentally demonstrated the origin of the first living cell from inanimate matter. This is not part of the theory of evolution. If a god/alien/hat made the first living organism and then evolution proceeded from there, the theory of evolution would still hold true. Considering everything was made by reptilian aliens about two weeks ago, evolution is as much fact as all of last year, which is to say neither actually happened. It's possible evolution may have been occurring since the worlds creation almost two weeks ago but I'm unaware of any experiments to test this and it would probably require a much longer period of time to prove.

Species are projected on Earth by angels from astral world, DNA is a crystal which resonates as the shape of its species.

Species are projected on Earth by angels from astral world, DNA is a crystal which resonates as the shape of its species. Also, cells are just turds that have been made part of living organisms, thoughts are just dreams of the belidae family of weevils.

View Full Version: What do you choose?