View Full Version: Im new

idu >>General Discussion >>Im new


<< Prev | Next >>

Jotun- 02-19-2007

Oh see with Alex claiming things like GP will change your bone structure that seemed to me a cosmetic change, but now I see that unattractiveness is actually tantamount to a disease which requires healing; Being unattractive means you are unhealthy. Can a perfectly healthy person benefit from taking GP? Whatever happened to beauty being in the eye of the beholder?

jc- 02-19-2007

JOTAN, why is it that you are negative with the rings or GP+SCF when you have not tried them .? You should at least try the rings right .?

tyciol- 02-19-2007

Did you know that bones are alive and they're not dead like hair? They're always in motion. They restructure according to physical demands (with proper nutrition). It's not unfeasible they'd remodel, though I'm still not sure why they would unless they were crippled or malformed or something. Short of that, genetic default is probably ideal for us.

Jotun- 02-20-2007

JOTAN, why is it that you are negative with the rings or GP+SCF when you have not tried them .? You should at least try the rings right .? jc, I'm negative towards Alex - and his products by extension - because I think he and people like him are a large part of what is detrimenting humanity. I understand you are a firm supporter of him and his products so I could grind my fingertips down to the bone trying to explain to you how ridiculous his claims and products are to me, but nothing would sway you. I respect your beliefs, please respect mine, and lets leave it at that. I do not respect Alex however and think he is a delusional, moneygrubbing snake.

jc- 02-20-2007

JOTUN WROTE : I understand you are a firm supporter of him and his products so I could grind my fingertips down to the bone trying to explain to you how ridiculous his claims and products are to me, but nothing would sway you. I respect your beliefs, please respect mine, and lets leave it at that. I do not respect Alex however and think he is a delusional, moneygrubbing snake Claims ? does not my testimonial and others convince you the rings work ? Your calling ALEX a snake without trying out the rings, i support what works but you just trash ALEX CHIUS products without knowing what they do...

CerealRapist- 02-20-2007

I agree that to whatever extent we can, we should investigate claims before pronouncing them fraudulent or, on the flip side, believing them unquestioningly-- but the reality is that many people out there are conmen who will take advantage of gullibility. None of us has enough money or time to blow on every single bizarre claim being touted out there. Therefore, it only seems reasonable that Alex, who is making the claims, should bear the burden of proof. This is a standard protocol of the scientific method-- and Alex has repeatedly refused to comply. Should everyone believe him because a handful of message board users say his products work? In my humble opinion, HELL NO. He needs to show physical evidence in whatever means necessary to show beyond a shadow of a doubt that what he is claiming is true, especially when it reeks so strongly of fraud, and falls so far outside the boundaries of every standard of current scientific knowledge. Until then, he is a fringe lunatic making ridiculous claims, and shirking his responsibility to show evidence before selling products promising extraordinary results. PERIOD.

vator- 02-20-2007

I think there is a middle between this two opposed positions some of you guys have taken. For one thing, there is not evidence as to the rings/GP/SCF can made that great stuff is claimed by Alex, because he has established real strong statement about GP reshaping your bones possibly in matter of days and the rings making an old man looking dramatically young in just three months. Maybe there are sombdys who have HAD those results, maybe, but if they don't come to show then that is hard to believe. But in the other hand, there are others who can percieve something going on with the rings, me for example, even tho, I havent had the expected results yet. Is it possible this stuff work just for for some and not for others?, would it depend on something as eating habits, race, line of work, attitude over level of the sea from where you live? is there anything else that can make them work for people who don't feel anything?, who the hell knows? I think there is a long way to go with researching seriously, formally this tech because it could has something to it. So, and because we don't have this research, a curious person owe to themselves at least trying the products and see (you can even try for FREE, the bluprint of rings is public!), If we could have more and more reports, at least a foundation for an empiric "right" use of it could be inferred, the same way as it was in the beginning with every herbal remedy (how do you think that chamomille was discovered first to be good for stomach illnes?) So I've been doing this, reporting as objetive as I can my findings and I would like to see more reports like this. Maybe if Alex could find the way for people report in a established format would help, but I don't think this is happening soon. Remember I've just arrived a couple of months ago and I never got to see the old forum, so if any evidence was produced there, excuse me, I missed it. This stuff is for free, so please guys, at least try the rings before conmdening them and report back your findings

CerealRapist- 02-20-2007

I never got to see the old forum, so if any evidence was produced there Evidence? That word means nothing to most of these people.